Donald Trump’s recent close call with an assassin at a rally in Pennsylvania has sparked criticisms of the Secret Service’s response and led to calls for improved security measures. While a sniper eventually took down the assailant, there were multiple lapses in security that almost resulted in Trump’s death. The lack of transparency from the Secret Service has further fueled suspicions about a potential cover-up.
Comparisons have been drawn to Israel’s Mossad, known for its efficient intelligence operations and swift actions. In a recent operation, Mossad successfully eliminated two terrorist leaders in Beirut and Tehran within days of a Hezbollah rocket attack that killed 12 children. The precision and effectiveness of Mossad’s operations have raised questions about the capabilities of U.S. intelligence agencies.
Critics argue that if Mossad could track and eliminate wanted terrorists within a matter of days, why couldn’t the Secret Service prevent an armed individual from posing a threat to a former president? The contrast between Mossad’s swift actions and the Secret Service’s failures has led to suggestions that the U.S. should consider hiring Mossad for its security operations.
The incident has also highlighted the need for better intelligence gathering and coordination within U.S. agencies to prevent future security breaches. The lack of prior intelligence on the would-be assassin and the slow response from the Secret Service have raised concerns about the effectiveness of current security protocols.
As the Biden administration faces scrutiny over the incident, questions remain about the accountability of the Secret Service and the need for more transparent communication with the public. The comparison to Mossad’s operations serves as a stark reminder of the importance of efficient intelligence and security measures in protecting national leaders.
Source
Photo credit www.bostonherald.com