The case of the Boston Marathon bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, has been sent back to a lower court for further investigation into possible juror bias. This decision was made by the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which ruled that a juror in Tsarnaev’s trial had not been completely honest during the jury selection process. The juror had failed to disclose that he had written social media posts expressing strong opinions about the case, including referring to Tsarnaev as a “piece of garbage.”
The court stated that the juror’s actions may have violated Tsarnaev’s right to a fair trial and impartial jury. As a result, they ordered the lower court to hold a hearing to determine whether the juror’s bias affected the outcome of the trial. Tsarnaev was convicted in 2015 for his role in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, which killed three people and injured over 260 others.
Tsarnaev’s attorneys have long argued that he did not receive a fair trial due to the intense media coverage and emotional impact of the bombings on the city of Boston. They believe that the revelations about the juror’s bias further support their claims. The decision to investigate juror bias has sparked mixed reactions, with some individuals expressing concern about the potential impact on the outcome of the case and others supporting the pursuit of justice and fairness.
Overall, the ruling to send Tsarnaev’s case back to the lower court for further investigation into juror bias has reignited debates about the fairness of his trial and the complexities of seeking justice in high-profile cases. The outcome of the probe could have significant implications for Tsarnaev’s future legal proceedings.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com