Presidential campaigns need proper licenses and approvals to play copyrighted music
Presidential candidates campaigning for the 2024 election must obtain the proper licenses and approvals to play copyrighted music. Without these permissions, they risk public condemnation from artists and potential litigation. Campaign organizers often pay an annual fee for a blanket license from performance rights organizations to play any work within a rightsholder’s catalog during live performances. However, even with this license, artists or license holders can still object to the use of their music, which could lead to legal action.
Former President Trump faced backlash from artists after using their songs at campaign rallies without authorization. Artists like Celine Dion and Isaac Hayes’ families threatened legal action for the unauthorized use of their music. Trump did receive authorization from musicians like Kid Rock and Lee Greenwood. Campaigns typically obtain licenses from performing rights organizations like ASCAP to use a variety of songs from recognizable artists at live events. If an artist objects, the song is removed from the license.
Campaigns risk up to $150,000 in statutory damages for each work used without permission. Artists can issue cease and desist letters to campaigns, pressuring them to stop using their music. Political parties also face the challenge of selecting songs for their campaigns, with Democrats often having better luck in securing popular bands. The use of copyrighted music in campaigns underscores the importance of obtaining proper permissions to avoid legal consequences and public backlash.
Source
Photo credit www.nbcnewyork.com