Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance has been sparking controversy with his past comments promoting the idea that Americans should have more children. His 2021 remarks calling Vice President Kamala Harris a “childless cat lady” have resurfaced and drawn criticism, along with other statements suggesting that teachers should have kids and that car seats may hinder families from having more children. This rhetoric aligns with a global trend of pronatalist policies aimed at increasing fertility rates, but historically, these policies have often been tied to backlash against women’s rights and immigration.
As fertility rates decline worldwide, the United Nations reports that over half of countries have rates below what is needed to prevent population decline. Advocates for population control argue that sustainability and human rights are at risk if too many children are born. However, some countries, like Hungary and Italy, have implemented pro-family policies in response to declining populations, with some leaning towards restrictions on reproductive rights.
Pronatalist policies have historical ties to the early 20th century in the United States, with figures like Theodore Roosevelt advocating for larger families to avoid “race suicide.” Historians note that similar themes, such as concerns about changing gender roles and immigration, have recurred in today’s political discourse. Figures like Elon Musk have also weighed in on the need for more children, contributing to the ongoing debate.
Overall, the discussion surrounding pronatalism, immigration, and reproductive rights is central to the current political landscape in the U.S. as candidates like Vance seek to address concerns about declining populations and changing societal norms.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com