Massachusetts voters strongly supported the push by state Auditor Diana DiZoglio to audit her former colleagues in the Legislature on Election Day. However, a month later, DiZoglio is facing obstacles from powerful Democrats as she seeks to force lawmakers to open the books. The conflict has been characterized as a struggle between an underdog advocate for taxpayers and political titans who argue the audit violates constitutional separation of powers.
Despite the initial support from voters, attention on the matter has waned, with analysts suggesting that the issue is an insider play and not a priority for the public. The fight over the audit has shifted to legal technicalities, leading to predictions that it may not inspire outrage among voters. While DiZoglio and her allies continue to pressure legislative leaders, the ultimate decision is expected to rest with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Observers believe that the court will likely rule against DiZoglio’s push, viewing it as a constitutional “fishing expedition.” Despite doubts about the outcome, DiZoglio remains committed to her cause and resists attempts to undermine the audit. The ongoing dispute may not capture the attention of average voters but remains significant in the context of transparency and accountability in the State House.
While the public may have moved on to other concerns, the issue of the legislative audit remains a critical discussion for Massachusetts lawmakers and the state’s highest court. Ultimately, the fate of DiZoglio’s push for transparency within the Legislature will be determined by legal interpretations and the willingness of political leaders to adhere to the will of the voters.
Source
Photo credit www.masslive.com
