The Supreme Court will hear arguments on a controversial aspect of President Trump’s immigration policy regarding birthright citizenship on May 15. This case, pivotal for its potential ramifications, questions Trump’s executive order that seeks to limit citizenship rights for children born in the U.S. to parents who are citizens or lawful permanent residents, a departure from traditional interpretations of the 14th Amendment.
Trump’s administration argues that the policy should remain in effect during ongoing legal challenges, contradicting federal judges who have already deemed it likely unconstitutional. These judges, appointed across various administrations, have issued injunctions that block the enforcement of this order nationwide.
Historically, the Supreme Court has affirmed that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to all persons born in the U.S., as established in past rulings. Trump’s order, however, asserts that children of non-citizens do not qualify for this protection, which has sparked widespread legal challenges from expectant parents, immigrant rights groups, and multiple state attorneys general.
The administration’s request focuses on limiting the scope of these injunctions to specific parties involved in the lawsuits, contending that broader pauses on federal policies have become problematic. Critics argue that such limitations could disrupt uniform citizenship rules nationwide and reflect an attempt to sidestep judicial review.
With oral arguments taking place soon, the outcome could significantly impact birthright citizenship laws and set a precedent for how courts handle executive policies moving forward. The Supreme Court is expected to announce its ruling by the end of June or early July, igniting further debate over the interpretation of the citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image of the presented article.
