Renowned journalist and political analyst Rami Khouri has raised concerns that the recent ceasefire negotiations in Lebanon could result in another Western-led division of the Middle East. As tensions continue to escalate between Israel and Hezbollah, Khouri warns that the involvement of Western powers could lead to a partitioning of the region, similar to the Sykes-Picot Agreement that divided the Middle East after World War I.
Khouri argues that the current ceasefire talks, mediated by the United States and France, may serve as a pretext for further Western intervention in the Middle East. He points to past examples, such as the invasion of Iraq and the partitioning of Syria, as evidence of Western powers interfering in the region for their own strategic interests. Khouri believes that the involvement of external actors in the Lebanon conflict could exacerbate existing divisions and create new geopolitical fault lines.
The journalist also expresses concern that the interests of local actors, such as Hezbollah and Israel, could be sidelined in favor of broader regional and international agendas. He warns that a Western-led intervention in the Lebanon ceasefire negotiations may not lead to a sustainable peace, but instead deepen existing conflicts and divisions.
As tensions continue to simmer in the Middle East, Khouri emphasizes the importance of allowing local actors to take the lead in resolving conflicts and shaping the future of the region. He calls for a more inclusive and collaborative approach that prioritizes the interests and voices of those directly affected by the conflict.
In conclusion, Rami Khouri’s analysis serves as a cautionary reminder of the potential pitfalls of Western intervention in the Middle East. As Lebanon grapples with escalating tensions, the international community must tread carefully to ensure that any ceasefire negotiations do not result in further destabilization and division in the region.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com
