The city council of Boston has faced controversy after denying a request from the Satanic Temple to give an invocation at a meeting in 2016. The group sued the city, claiming religious discrimination under the first amendment. However, an appeals court recently ruled against the Satanic Temple, citing the established relationship that usual speakers have with council members and their involvement in the community. The court warned the city council about potential favoritism towards speakers representing religious majorities and urged caution in future invitations.
Lucien Greaves, co-founder of the Satanic Temple, criticized the ruling, stating it was a disregard for constitutional principles and allowed public officials to operate outside the law. The Satanic Temple was founded in 2013 to challenge the religious right and promote tolerance, advocating for issues such as abortion rights and fighting against prayer in schools.
The group does not believe in Satan in a literal sense but uses the symbol to stand against authoritarianism. The court’s decision raises questions about the balance between religious freedom and potential biases in the selection of speakers at city council meetings. Despite the outcome, the Satanic Temple remains committed to their mission of advocating for their beliefs and fighting against religious discrimination.
Source
Photo credit www.theguardian.com
